Hillary Clinton Subpoenaed to face Judicial Watch in court
Judicial Watch announced that a federal court will soon decide whether Judicial Watch lawyers will be able to question Hillary Clinton and her top assistant on the email and Benghazi disputes under oath. The court has already granted Judicial Watch additional discovery and is now considering questioning the objections made by Clinton on September 23. On 3 October, Judicial Watch filed its reply to Clinton.
The court has previously ordered discovery in three specific areas: whether the use of a private email server by Secretary Clinton was intended to stymie FOIA; whether the intent of the State Department to settle this case in late 2014 and early 2015 was bad faith; and whether the State Department has adequately searched for records responsive to the request of Judicial Watch.
The court ruled that the Clinton email system was “one of the gravest modern offenses to government transparency.”
The court specifically ordered Obama administration senior State Department officials, lawyers and Clinton aides to be deposed or answer written questions under oath.
On August 22, 2019, the court then ruled that Clinton and Mills had 30 days to oppose being questioned in person under oath by Judicial Watch related to former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s use of a private email server. Additionally, Judicial Watch was granted seven new depositions, three interrogatories and four document requests.
FOR MORE INFO VISIT JUDICIAL WATCH
KINDLY LIKE & SHARE THIS ARTICLE TO SUPPORT CERTIFIED CONSPIRACY...