Hillary Clinton Subpoenaed to face Judicial Watch in court 

Hillary Clinton Subpoenaed to face Judicial Watch in court

Judicial Watch announced that a federal court will soon decide whether Judicial Watch lawyers will be able to question Hillary Clinton and her top assistant on the email and Benghazi disputes under oath. The court has already granted Judicial Watch additional discovery and is now considering questioning the objections made by Clinton on September 23. On 3 October, Judicial Watch filed its reply to Clinton.

The court has previously ordered discovery in three specific areas: whether the use of a private email server by Secretary Clinton was intended to stymie FOIA; whether the intent of the State Department to settle this case in late 2014 and early 2015 was bad faith; and whether the State Department has adequately searched for records responsive to the request of Judicial Watch.

The court ruled that the Clinton email system was “one of the gravest modern offenses to government transparency.”

READ MORE : JUDICIAL WATCH FILES HEAVY PETITION AGAINST REP. ILHAN OMAR

The court specifically ordered Obama administration senior State Department officials, lawyers and Clinton aides to be deposed or answer written questions under oath.

On August 22, 2019, the court then ruled that Clinton and Mills had 30 days to oppose being questioned in person under oath by Judicial Watch related to former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s use of a private email server. Additionally, Judicial Watch was granted seven new depositions, three interrogatories and four document requests.

FOR MORE INFO VISIT JUDICIAL WATCH 

READ MORE : Judicial Watch Spills Out massive Bombshell that might send McCabe to jail

KINDLY LIKE & SHARE THIS ARTICLE TO SUPPORT CERTIFIED CONSPIRACY... 

6 thoughts on “Hillary Clinton Subpoenaed to face Judicial Watch in court 

  • October 12, 2019 at 2:08 pm
    Permalink

    Time to get justice for the AMERICAN people.

    Reply
  • October 13, 2019 at 5:00 am
    Permalink

    Subpoena after you claim the emails where stolen. So you’re going to charge her for what. The emails you received from cooks. Shame on you. Who knows what you all put and took out from the stolen emails. Leave Hilly alone. Frist Female president.

    Reply
  • October 13, 2019 at 5:06 am
    Permalink

    Subpoena after you claim the emails were stolen So you’re going to charge her for the emails you received from your so called crooks. Shame on you who knows what you all put and took out from the stolen emails. Leave Hilly alone. Frist Female president.

    Reply
    • October 13, 2019 at 9:57 pm
      Permalink

      My friend this is just a neutralizing factor to the continued Witch Hunt against Trump by Democrats.
      Such approach will put Democrats on their toes. And maybe they’ll tone down their rhetoric.

      Reply
  • October 13, 2019 at 6:18 am
    Permalink

    Shame on America you want to charge Hilly with stolen emails you received from your so called crooks. The same crooks you received the emails from they are the ones that stole her Presidency.

    Reply
    • November 11, 2019 at 9:44 pm
      Permalink

      She’s and her fellow Democrats are the crooks here hiding Emsiks there wouldn’t if be an investigation about her snd those emails if she was innocent. shes dirty and so are all Democrats! Trump is making American great!!

      Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

%d bloggers like this: