Finally, the American Center for Law and Justice received some fulfillment from the Department of Justice’s countless FOIA demands. It took a particular court order from a federal judge to release long-secret records that could raise some eyebrows among those still interested in Hillary Clinton’s assistants and missing messages from the former Secretary of State.
The ACLJ has obtained the DOJ’s infamous immunity agreements with Hillary Clinton’s top aides Cheryl Mills and Heather Samuelson – documents previously unreleased to the public and which include the DOJ attempting to enter an agreement not to comply with the requirements of FOIA, and which confirm it agreed to “dispose” of evidence, including Mills’ and Samuelson’s “culling laptops” which contained all of the missing emails from Hilary Clinton’s private homebrew server.Advertisement
The immunity agreements signed by Mills and Samuelson are, to say the least, overly generous to their legal interests:
As we have advised you, we consider Cheryl Mills to be a witness based on the information gathered to date in this investigation. We understand that Cheryl Mills is willing to voluntarily provide the Mills Laptop to the Federal Bureau of Investigation, if the United States agrees not to use any information directly obtained from the Mills Laptop in any prosecution of Cheryl Mills for the mishandling of classified information and/or the removal or destruction of records as described below.Advertisement
That could be quite standard. But what is extremely uncommon is that these laptops ‘ content remains the aides ‘ personal property. In other words, some of the contents are immune to requests from FOIA.
This became clear in a separate letter obtained by ACLJ:
The terms “custody and control” is a FOIA term of art. So, in other words, the DOJ/FBI purported or attempted to agree itself out of the requirements of FOIA, so that nothing on Mills’ or Samuelson’s culling laptops would be subject to FOIA. This agreement is particularly noteworthy given what former FBI lawyer Lisa Page told the DOJ Office of Inspector General:
[T]hese are the State Department’s records. And if the Secretary in the first place had actually followed normal protocol, every single one of these emails, whether personal or work-related would have been in the State Department’s possession, and there would be no attorney-client discussions happening with respect to the sort of this material.
In other words, the DOJ voluntarily agreed to refuse to comply with the requirements of FOIA as to documents that were clearly within the purview of FOIA requests and had otherwise been prevented from being FOIA’d by being stored on Clinton’s private server.Advertisement
Additional information uncovered by ACLJ is even more shocking:
The DOJ agreed that the FBI would “dispose” of Mills’ and Samuelson’s laptops after the search. According to the agreement:Advertisement
As soon as the investigation is completed, and to the extent consistent with all FBI policies and applicable laws, including the Federal Records Act, the FBI will dispose of the Device and any printed or electronic materials resulting from your search.
In other words, after agreeing to limit its search of Mills’ laptop to (1) only a certain method of searching; (2) only for certain email-related files; and, (3) only files created within a certain time-frame, the DOJ/FBI agreed to dispose of the laptop – meaning anything else embarrassing, negative or potentially implicating on the laptop – including official State Department records – would be destroyed and never be exposed. (Emphasis mine)
You may remember former FBI Director James Comey explaining to Congress that Hillary Clinton would have been charged with “no rational prosecutor.” It is hardly surprising that Comey would have made such a self-serving declaration under this immunity contract.
What these different FOIA revelations showed is that from the beginning the fix was in for Hillary’s “exoneration.” It is also clear that a privileged standard of justice applied to Clinton and her assistants has made it extremely difficult to prosecute her.
With these revelations from the FOIA, it is now apparent who is it who attempted to steal the 2016 election. Hillary Clinton will be brought to justice with her cohorts regardless of the cover-up.
Kindly like & share this article to support Certified Conspiracy